Quantcast
Channel: Active questions tagged real-analysis - Mathematics Stack Exchange
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 9155

Rudin's proof on the Analytic Incompleteness of Rationals [duplicate]

$
0
0

In Rudin's classical "Principles of Mathematical Analysis," he gave a proof like this:

Claim: Let $A= \{p\in \mathbb{Q} | p>0, p^2 <2\}$. Then A contains no largest number.

Proof: Given any $p\in A$. Let $q = p-\frac{p^2 -2}{p+2}$.

Later Rudin claimed that $q^2<2,$ and $q>p$. My instructor asks us to think about a question on our own: Why is such $q$ a natural choice in this proof?

I can see that in this way, $q>p$ is for sure. However, how does it become a natural choice?


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 9155

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>