Quantcast
Channel: Active questions tagged real-analysis - Mathematics Stack Exchange
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8698

Is there any danger in supposing m>n in the Cauchy sequence conditions?

$
0
0

$$\forall \epsilon > 0,\ \text{let} \ N=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\epsilon}}.$$$$\text{So}, \ m>n>N \implies \frac{1}{m^2}<\epsilon. $$$$|s_n-s_m| = \frac{n^2-1}{n^2}-\frac{m^2-1}{m^2}=\frac{1}{m^2}-\frac{1}{n^2} < \frac{1}{m^2} < \epsilon$$I am wondering about the definition of the Cauchy sequence and why most of the proofs I see do not assume WLOG $n>m$. In my recent assignment both my proofs immediately assumed $m>n$. Above is a shortened example. However, the proof presented in class and others I have seen online (for this problem and others) generally seem to avoid doing this. I'm pretty sure it's ok (since $|s_n-s_m|=|s_m-s_n|$) but I am wondering if there is some reason it not done more often.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8698

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>