Quantcast
Channel: Active questions tagged real-analysis - Mathematics Stack Exchange
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 9741

Under what assumptions on f can I calculate f([a, b])?

$
0
0

I know that:

  • If $f$ is continuous and monotonous on $[a, b]$, then $$f([a, b]) = [\min(f(a), f(b)), \max(f(a), f(b))]$$
  • If $f$ is continuous and unimodal on $[a, b]$ with an extremum at $x_0 \in [a, b]$, then $$f([a, b]) = [\min\{f(a), f(x_0), f(b)\}, \max\{f(a), f(x_0), f(b)\}]$$
  • If $f=\cos$ or $f=\sin$, then I can calculate $f([a, b])$ with a tedious disjunction of six cases depending on the positions of $a$ and $b$ relative to $2k\pi$ and $(2k+1)\pi$.
  • If $f$ is periodic with period $T$ and $b-a \geq T$, then $f([a, b]) = \operatorname{range}(f)$; but if $b-a < T$, not much can be said.

What other assumption on $f$ could allow me to calculate $f([a, b])$?

By "calculate" I mean constructively calculate, assuming that I can call function $f$ on particular values, including $a$, $b$, any value given as part of the assumption such as $x_0$ above, or any other value that I can constructively calculate.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 9741

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>